prikaz prve stranice dokumenta Why would very bad lives be worth continuing?
  Preuzmi
PDF 454.96 KB
Znanstveni rad - Izvorni znanstveni rad
Why would very bad lives be worth continuing?
South African Journal of Philosophy, 39 (2020), 3; 285-295. https://doi.org/10.1080/02580136.2020.1809122
Sušnik, Matej

Citirajte ovaj rad

Sušnik, M. (2020). Why would very bad lives be worth continuing?. South African Journal of Philosophy, 39. (3), 285-295. doi: 10.1080/02580136.2020.1809122

Sušnik, Matej. "Why would very bad lives be worth continuing?." South African Journal of Philosophy, vol. 39, br. 3, 2020, str. 285-295. https://doi.org/10.1080/02580136.2020.1809122

Sušnik, Matej. "Why would very bad lives be worth continuing?." South African Journal of Philosophy 39, br. 3 (2020): 285-295. https://doi.org/10.1080/02580136.2020.1809122

Sušnik, M. (2020) 'Why would very bad lives be worth continuing?', South African Journal of Philosophy, 39(3), str. 285-295. doi: 10.1080/02580136.2020.1809122

Sušnik M. Why would very bad lives be worth continuing?. South African Journal of Philosophy [Internet]. 2020. [pristupljeno 28.03.2024.];39(3):285-295. doi: 10.1080/02580136.2020.1809122

M. Sušnik, "Why would very bad lives be worth continuing?", South African Journal of Philosophy, vol. 39, br. 3, str. 285-295, 2020. [Online]. Dostupno na: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:261:582128. [Citirano: 28.03.2024.]

Za citiranje koristite ovu mrežnu adresu: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:261:582128
Prijavite se u repozitorij kako biste mogli spremiti objekt u svoju listu.
Podaci o radu
Naslov (engleski)Why would very bad lives be worth continuing?
AutorMatej Sušnik
Autorova ustanovaInstitut za filozofiju
Znanstveno / umjetničko
područje, polje i grana		HUMANISTIČKE ZNANOSTI
Filozofija
Sažetak (engleski)
David Benatar believes that (1) all human lives are very bad ; that (2) some human lives are worth continuing ; and that (3) some human lives are not worth continuing. This article claims that Benatar’s arguments do not support all three statements at once. After giving a brief outline of his position, it is shown that insofar as his arguments support (1) and (2), they do not support (3), and that insofar as they support (1) and (3), they do not support (2). It is then shown that insofar as they support (2) and (3), they do not support (1).
Ključne riječi (engleski)
Jezikengleski
Vrsta publikacijeZnanstveni rad - Izvorni znanstveni rad
Status objaveObjavljen
Vrsta recenzijeRecenziran - međunarodna recenzija
Verzija publikacijeObjavljena verzija rada (izdavačev PDF)
Naslov časopisaSouth African Journal of Philosophy
Brojčani podacivol. 39, br. 3, str. 285-295
p-ISSN0258-0136
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1080/02580136.2020.1809122
URN:NBNurn:nbn:hr:261:582128
Datum objave publikacije2020
ProjektŠifra: UIP-2017-05-4308
Naziv (hrvatski): Šteta, namjere i odgovornost
Kratica: HIRe
Voditelj: Matej Sušnik
Pravna nadležnost: Hrvatska
Financijer: HRZZ
Linija financiranja: UIP
Vrsta resursaTekst
Prava pristupaOtvoreni pristup
Uvjeti korištenjaIkona licence Zaštićeno autorskim pravom.
Datum i vrijeme pohrane2022-01-24 11:40:17