prikaz prve stranice dokumenta Does it Matter Who is Driving the Trolley
Pristup korisnicima matične ustanove
Znanstveni rad - Izvorni znanstveni rad
Does it Matter Who is Driving the Trolley
Dialectica, 70 (2016), 1; 49-63. urn:nbn:hr:261:335225
Sušnik, Matej

Citirajte ovaj rad

Sušnik, M. (2016). Does it Matter Who is Driving the Trolley. Dialectica, 70. (1), 49-63. Preuzeto s https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:261:335225

Sušnik, Matej. "Does it Matter Who is Driving the Trolley." Dialectica, vol. 70, br. 1, 2016, str. 49-63. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:261:335225

Sušnik, Matej. "Does it Matter Who is Driving the Trolley." Dialectica 70, br. 1 (2016): 49-63. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:261:335225

Sušnik, M. (2016) 'Does it Matter Who is Driving the Trolley', Dialectica, 70(1), str. 49-63. Preuzeto s: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:261:335225 (Datum pristupa: 09.12.2024.)

Sušnik M. Does it Matter Who is Driving the Trolley. Dialectica [Internet]. 2016. [pristupljeno 09.12.2024.];70(1):49-63. Dostupno na: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:261:335225

M. Sušnik, "Does it Matter Who is Driving the Trolley", Dialectica, vol. 70, br. 1, str. 49-63, 2016. [Online]. Dostupno na: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:261:335225. [Citirano: 09.12.2024.]

Za citiranje koristite ovu mrežnu adresu: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:261:335225
Prijavite se u repozitorij kako biste mogli spremiti objekt u svoju listu.
Podaci o radu
Naslov (engleski)Does it Matter Who is Driving the Trolley
AutorMatej Sušnik
Autorova ustanovaInstitut za filozofiju
Znanstveno / umjetničko
područje, polje i grana		HUMANISTIČKE ZNANOSTI
Filozofija
Sažetak (engleski)
Contemporary defenses of the doctrine of double effect (DDE) are mainly focused on avoiding the absurdity charge raised by Judith Thomson (1991). There are two strategies proposed in the literature for refuting Thomson’s argument. In this paper I argue that answering Thomson’s challenge comes at a heavy price: while both versions of the DDE that are developed within these two strategies successfully avoid the absurdity charge, they also remain incomplete. Thomson’s argument reveals that the proponents of the DDE can at best provide a partial defense of the claim that intentions can be relevant to permissibility.
Ključne riječi (engleski)
Jezikengleski
Vrsta publikacijeZnanstveni rad - Izvorni znanstveni rad
Status objaveObjavljen
Vrsta recenzijeRecenziran - međunarodna recenzija
Verzija publikacijeObjavljena verzija rada (izdavačev PDF)
Naslov časopisaDialectica
Brojčani podacivol. 70, br. 1, str. 49-63
p-ISSN0012-2017
e-ISSN1746-8361
URN:NBNurn:nbn:hr:261:335225
Datum objave publikacije2016
Vrsta resursaTekst
Prava pristupaInstitucijski pristup
Uvjeti korištenjaIkona licence Zaštićeno autorskim pravom.
Datum i vrijeme pohrane2021-04-22 09:22:55