prikaz prve stranice dokumenta Intentions, collateral damage and indifference to human life
  Download
PDF 200.74 KB
Scientific paper - Original scientific paper
Intentions, collateral damage and indifference to human life
Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics, XXII (2020), 3; 817-832. https://doi.org/10.13137/1825-5167/31714
Sušnik, Matej

Cite this document

Sušnik, M. (2020). Intentions, collateral damage and indifference to human life. Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics, XXII. (3), 817-832. doi: 10.13137/1825-5167/31714

Sušnik, Matej. "Intentions, collateral damage and indifference to human life." Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics, vol. XXII, no. 3, 2020, pp. 817-832. https://doi.org/10.13137/1825-5167/31714

Sušnik, Matej. "Intentions, collateral damage and indifference to human life." Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics XXII, no. 3 (2020): 817-832. https://doi.org/10.13137/1825-5167/31714

Sušnik, M. (2020) 'Intentions, collateral damage and indifference to human life', Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics, XXII(3), pp. 817-832. doi: 10.13137/1825-5167/31714

Sušnik M. Intentions, collateral damage and indifference to human life. Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2024 April 29];XXII(3):817-832. doi: 10.13137/1825-5167/31714

M. Sušnik, "Intentions, collateral damage and indifference to human life", Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics, vol. XXII, no. 3, pp. 817-832, 2020. [Online]. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:261:571611. [Accessed: 29 April 2024]

Please login to the repository to save this object to your list.
Metadata
Title (english)Intentions, collateral damage and indifference to human life
AuthorMatej Sušnik
Author's institutionInstitute of Philosophy
Scientific / art field,
discipline and subdiscipline		HUMANISTIC SCIENCES
Philosophy
Abstract (english)
In this paper, I discuss a possible moral difference between terrorism and war. The standard approach to this question relies on the doctrine of double effect (DDE). The DDE advocates believe that it matters morally whether certain harm is intentionally caused or whether it merely occurs as a foreseen but unintended side effect. I suggest that the DDE does not answer the question and that the moral difference between terrorism and war cannot be adequately captured as long as one focuses on moral justification or permissibility. The critical difference, it is claimed, is not that war is sometimes morally right or permissible, but that terrorism and war do not display the same attitude toward innocent people. The distinction between permissibility and blameworthiness also enables us to see why some wars, such as those covered by the name “war on terror”, should be morally distinguished from terrorism.
Keywords (english)
Languageenglish
Publication typeScientific paper - Original scientific paper
Publication statusPublished
Peer reviewPeer review - international
Publication versionPublished version
Journal titleEtica & Politica / Ethics & Politics
Numberingvol. XXII, no. 3, pp. 817-832
p-ISSN1825-5167
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.13137/1825-5167/31714
URN:NBNurn:nbn:hr:261:571611
Publication2020
ProjectNumber: UIP-2017-05-4308
Title (croatian): Šteta, namjere i odgovornost
Acronym: HIRe
Leader: Matej Sušnik
Jurisdiction: Croatia
Funding stream: UIP
Type of resourceText
Access conditionsOpen access
Terms of useLicence In copyright icon
Created on2022-01-24 11:49:06