Why would very bad lives be worth continuing? | Repository of the Institute of Philosophy

prikaz prve stranice dokumenta Why would very bad lives be worth continuing?

Download
PDF 454.96 KB

Scientific paper - Original scientific paper

Why would very bad lives be worth continuing?

South African Journal of Philosophy, 39 (2020), 3; 285-295. https://doi.org/10.1080/02580136.2020.1809122

Cite this document

APA 6th Edition

Sušnik, M. (2020). Why would very bad lives be worth continuing?. South African Journal of Philosophy, 39. (3), 285-295. doi: 10.1080/02580136.2020.1809122

MLA 8th Edition

Sušnik, Matej. "Why would very bad lives be worth continuing?." South African Journal of Philosophy, vol. 39, no. 3, 2020, pp. 285-295. https://doi.org/10.1080/02580136.2020.1809122

Chicago 17th Edition

Sušnik, Matej. "Why would very bad lives be worth continuing?." South African Journal of Philosophy 39, no. 3 (2020): 285-295. https://doi.org/10.1080/02580136.2020.1809122

Harvard

Sušnik, M. (2020) 'Why would very bad lives be worth continuing?', South African Journal of Philosophy, 39(3), pp. 285-295. doi: 10.1080/02580136.2020.1809122

Vancouver

Sušnik M. Why would very bad lives be worth continuing?. South African Journal of Philosophy [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2024 November 18];39(3):285-295. doi: 10.1080/02580136.2020.1809122

IEEE

M. Sušnik, "Why would very bad lives be worth continuing?", South African Journal of Philosophy, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 285-295, 2020. [Online]. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:261:582128. [Accessed: 18 November 2024]

Cite this item: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:261:582128

Please login to the repository to save this object to your list.

Metadata

Title (english)	Why would very bad lives be worth continuing?
Author	Matej Sušnik
Author's institution	Institute of Philosophy
Scientific / art field, discipline and subdiscipline	HUMANISTIC SCIENCES Philosophy
Abstract (english)	David Benatar believes that (1) all human lives are very bad ; that (2) some human lives are worth continuing ; and that (3) some human lives are not worth continuing. This article claims that Benatar’s arguments do not support all three statements at once. After giving a brief outline of his position, it is shown that insofar as his arguments support (1) and (2), they do not support (3), and that insofar as they support (1) and (3), they do not support (2). It is then shown that insofar as they support (2) and (3), they do not support (1).
Keywords (english)
Language	english
Publication type	Scientific paper - Original scientific paper
Publication status	Published
Peer review	Peer review - international
Publication version	Published version
Journal title	South African Journal of Philosophy
Numbering	vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 285-295
p-ISSN	0258-0136
DOI	https://doi.org/10.1080/02580136.2020.1809122
URN:NBN	urn:nbn:hr:261:582128
Publication	2020
Project	Number: UIP-2017-05-4308 Title (croatian): Šteta, namjere i odgovornost Acronym: HIRe Leader: Matej Sušnik Jurisdiction: Croatia Funding stream: UIP
Type of resource	Text
Access conditions	Open access
Terms of use
Created on	2022-01-24 11:40:17