prikaz prve stranice dokumenta Multiple Analogy in Ps.-Aristotle, De Mundo 6
  Download
PDF 389.21 KB
Scientific paper - Original scientific paper
Multiple Analogy in Ps.-Aristotle, De Mundo 6
Classical Quarterly, 64 (2014), 2; 574-591. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009838814000172
Betegh, Gabor; Gregorić, Pavel

Cite this document

Betegh, G. & Gregorić, P. (2014). Multiple Analogy in Ps.-Aristotle, De Mundo 6. Classical Quarterly, 64. (2), 574-591. doi: 10.1017/S0009838814000172

Betegh, Gabor and Pavel Gregorić. "Multiple Analogy in Ps.-Aristotle, De Mundo 6." Classical Quarterly, vol. 64, no. 2, 2014, pp. 574-591. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009838814000172

Betegh, Gabor and Pavel Gregorić. "Multiple Analogy in Ps.-Aristotle, De Mundo 6." Classical Quarterly 64, no. 2 (2014): 574-591. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009838814000172

Betegh, G. and Gregorić, P. (2014) 'Multiple Analogy in Ps.-Aristotle, De Mundo 6', Classical Quarterly, 64(2), pp. 574-591. doi: 10.1017/S0009838814000172

Betegh G, Gregorić P. Multiple Analogy in Ps.-Aristotle, De Mundo 6. Classical Quarterly [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2024 April 26];64(2):574-591. doi: 10.1017/S0009838814000172

G. Betegh and P. Gregorić, "Multiple Analogy in Ps.-Aristotle, De Mundo 6", Classical Quarterly, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 574-591, 2014. [Online]. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:261:068150. [Accessed: 26 April 2024]

Please login to the repository to save this object to your list.
Metadata
Title (english)Multiple Analogy in Ps.-Aristotle, De Mundo 6
AuthorGabor Betegh
AuthorPavel Gregorić
Author's institutionInstitute of Philosophy
Scientific / art field,
discipline and subdiscipline		HUMANISTIC SCIENCES
Philosophy
Abstract (english)
The short treatise known as Περὶ κόσμου (De mundo) is a learned piece of protreptic addressed to Alexander, ‘the best of princes’, usually identified with Alexander the Great. The treatise is traditionally attributed to Aristotle, and although it does espouse recognizably Aristotelian views, it contains various doctrinal and linguistic elements which have led the large majority of scholars to regard it as inauthentic. The dating of the treatise is a more controversial matter, though most scholars would put it somewhere in the Hellenistic period.
Keywords (english)
Languageenglish
Publication typeScientific paper - Original scientific paper
Publication statusPublished
Peer reviewPeer review - international
Publication versionPublished version
Journal titleClassical Quarterly
Numberingvol. 64, no. 2, pp. 574-591
p-ISSN0009-8388
e-ISSN1471-6844
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1017/S0009838814000172
URN:NBNurn:nbn:hr:261:068150
Publication2014
Document URLhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/classical-quarterly
Type of resourceText
Access conditionsOpen access
Terms of useLicence In copyright icon
Created on2021-06-23 13:41:48