prikaz prve stranice dokumenta Definije umjetnosi i formalizam
  Download
PDF 320.03 KB
Scientific paper - Review paper
Definije umjetnosi i formalizam
Bogoslovska smotra, 83 (2013), 2; 375-390. urn:nbn:hr:261:437243
Pećnjak, Davor; Bartulin, Dragica

Cite this document

Pećnjak, D. & Bartulin, D. (2013). Definije umjetnosi i formalizam. Bogoslovska smotra, 83. (2), 375-390. Retrieved from https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:261:437243

Pećnjak, Davor and Dragica Bartulin. "Definije umjetnosi i formalizam." Bogoslovska smotra, vol. 83, no. 2, 2013, pp. 375-390. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:261:437243

Pećnjak, Davor and Dragica Bartulin. "Definije umjetnosi i formalizam." Bogoslovska smotra 83, no. 2 (2013): 375-390. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:261:437243

Pećnjak, D. and Bartulin, D. (2013) 'Definije umjetnosi i formalizam', Bogoslovska smotra, 83(2), pp. 375-390. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:261:437243 (Accessed 22 April 2024)

Pećnjak D, Bartulin D. Definije umjetnosi i formalizam. Bogoslovska smotra [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2024 April 22];83(2):375-390. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:261:437243

D. Pećnjak and D. Bartulin, "Definije umjetnosi i formalizam", Bogoslovska smotra, vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 375-390, 2013. [Online]. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:261:437243. [Accessed: 22 April 2024]

Please login to the repository to save this object to your list.
Metadata
Title (croatian)Definije umjetnosi i formalizam
Title (english)Definitions of Art and Formalism
AuthorDavor Pećnjak
AuthorDragica Bartulin
Author's institutionInstitute of Philosophy
Scientific / art field,
discipline and subdiscipline		HUMANISTIC SCIENCES
Philosophy
Abstract (croatian)
U ovom radu prikazujemo i ispitujemo neke aspekte definiranja umjetnosti. Posebnu pažnju pridajemo formalističkoj teoriji umjetnosti. Nemamo namjeru cjelovito analizirati pokušaje definiranja umjetnosti, niti predložiti neku novu definiciju umjetnosti. Pokazat ćemo da su reprezentacijska teorija, ekspresivistička teorija, teorija otvorenog koncepta, institucijska teorija i povijesna teorija neadekvatne za definiranje umjetnosti i umjetničkog djela. Glede neadekvatnosti estetičke, povijesno-narativne i hibridne teorije upućujemo na drugu literaturu. Smatramo kako se formalistička teorija može obraniti od glavnih prigovora za razliku od ostalih teorija, te bi tako formalizam ipak mogao biti najbolja teorija umjetnosti pomoću koje bi se moglo definirati umjetnost i umjetničko djelo.
Abstract (english)
In this article the authors are presenting and analysing some aspects of the way in which art is defined. A special attention is given to the formalistic theory of art. The intention is not to provide either the complete analysis of the attempts to define art or a new definition of art. Instead, the authors show that the representational theory, expressive theory, open concept theory, institutional theory, and historical theory are inadequate in defining art and a work of art. The authors also refer to the relevant literature that shows inadequacy of aesthetic theory, historical-narrative theory, and hybrid theory of art. They are convinced that the formalistic theory of art, as opposed to other theories, can withstand the main objections, which may point to formalism as the best theory in defining art and a work of art.
Keywords (croatian)
Keywords (english)
Languagecroatian
Publication typeScientific paper - Review paper
Publication statusPublished
Peer reviewUnknown
Publication versionPublished version
Journal titleBogoslovska smotra
Numberingvol. 83, no. 2, pp. 375-390
p-ISSN0352-3101
e-ISSN1848-9648
URN:NBNurn:nbn:hr:261:437243
Publication2013
Type of resourceText
Access conditionsOpen access
Terms of useLicence In copyright icon
Created on2021-05-26 11:30:08