prikaz prve stranice dokumenta Does it Matter Who is Driving the Trolley
Access restricted to students and staff of home institution
Scientific paper - Original scientific paper
Does it Matter Who is Driving the Trolley
Dialectica, 70 (2016), 1; 49-63. urn:nbn:hr:261:335225
Sušnik, Matej

Cite this document

Sušnik, M. (2016). Does it Matter Who is Driving the Trolley. Dialectica, 70. (1), 49-63. Retrieved from https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:261:335225

Sušnik, Matej. "Does it Matter Who is Driving the Trolley." Dialectica, vol. 70, no. 1, 2016, pp. 49-63. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:261:335225

Sušnik, Matej. "Does it Matter Who is Driving the Trolley." Dialectica 70, no. 1 (2016): 49-63. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:261:335225

Sušnik, M. (2016) 'Does it Matter Who is Driving the Trolley', Dialectica, 70(1), pp. 49-63. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:261:335225 (Accessed 18 November 2024)

Sušnik M. Does it Matter Who is Driving the Trolley. Dialectica [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2024 November 18];70(1):49-63. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:261:335225

M. Sušnik, "Does it Matter Who is Driving the Trolley", Dialectica, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 49-63, 2016. [Online]. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:261:335225. [Accessed: 18 November 2024]

Please login to the repository to save this object to your list.
Metadata
Title (english)Does it Matter Who is Driving the Trolley
AuthorMatej Sušnik
Author's institutionInstitute of Philosophy
Scientific / art field,
discipline and subdiscipline		HUMANISTIC SCIENCES
Philosophy
Abstract (english)
Contemporary defenses of the doctrine of double effect (DDE) are mainly focused on avoiding the absurdity charge raised by Judith Thomson (1991). There are two strategies proposed in the literature for refuting Thomson’s argument. In this paper I argue that answering Thomson’s challenge comes at a heavy price: while both versions of the DDE that are developed within these two strategies successfully avoid the absurdity charge, they also remain incomplete. Thomson’s argument reveals that the proponents of the DDE can at best provide a partial defense of the claim that intentions can be relevant to permissibility.
Keywords (english)
Languageenglish
Publication typeScientific paper - Original scientific paper
Publication statusPublished
Peer reviewPeer review - international
Publication versionPublished version
Journal titleDialectica
Numberingvol. 70, no. 1, pp. 49-63
p-ISSN0012-2017
e-ISSN1746-8361
URN:NBNurn:nbn:hr:261:335225
Publication2016
Type of resourceText
Access conditionsInstitutional access
Terms of useLicence In copyright icon
Created on2021-04-22 09:22:55