prikaz prve stranice dokumenta “To See and Hear That Which is Not Present”: Aristotle on the Objects of Memory
Access restricted to students and staff of home institution
Scientific paper - Original scientific paper
“To See and Hear That Which is Not Present”: Aristotle on the Objects of Memory
Philosophisches Jahrbuch, (2022); urn:nbn:hr:261:981912
Grgić, Filip; Grgić, Ana

Cite this document

Grgić, F. & Grgić, A. (2022). “To See and Hear That Which is Not Present”: Aristotle on the Objects of Memory. Philosophisches Jahrbuch. Retrieved from https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:261:981912

Grgić, Filip and Ana Grgić. "“To See and Hear That Which is Not Present”: Aristotle on the Objects of Memory." Philosophisches Jahrbuch, 2022. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:261:981912

Grgić, Filip and Ana Grgić. "“To See and Hear That Which is Not Present”: Aristotle on the Objects of Memory." Philosophisches Jahrbuch (2022). https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:261:981912

Grgić, F. and Grgić, A. (2022) '“To See and Hear That Which is Not Present”: Aristotle on the Objects of Memory', Philosophisches Jahrbuch. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:261:981912 (Accessed 17 November 2024)

Grgić F, Grgić A. “To See and Hear That Which is Not Present”: Aristotle on the Objects of Memory. Philosophisches Jahrbuch [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2024 November 17]. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:261:981912

F. Grgić and A. Grgić, "“To See and Hear That Which is Not Present”: Aristotle on the Objects of Memory", Philosophisches Jahrbuch, 2022. [Online]. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:261:981912. [Accessed: 17 November 2024]

Please login to the repository to save this object to your list.
Metadata
Title (english)“To See and Hear That Which is Not Present”: Aristotle on the Objects of Memory
AuthorFilip Grgić
AuthorAna Grgić
Author's institutionInstitute of Philosophy
Scientific / art field,
discipline and subdiscipline		HUMANISTIC SCIENCES
Philosophy
History of Philosophy
Abstract (english)
In this paper, we show that there are some strong philosophical and exegetical reasons to argue that according to the view developed in the first chapter of Aristotle’s De Memoria, the objects of memory are non-present, or absent, things and events rather than our past acts of awareness of them. We argue that on Aristotle’s account, the objects of memory can be particulars or universals, perceptibles or intelligibles, and that all these kinds of things are past in the same sense, namely, in the sense of previously having been present to the perceiver or knower. Aristotle’s claim that we remember that we previously learned or saw something is the description of how, rather than what, we remember.
Keywords (english)
Languageenglish
Publication typeScientific paper - Original scientific paper
Publication statusAccepted
Peer reviewPeer review - international
Publication versionAccepted version
Journal titlePhilosophisches Jahrbuch
p-ISSN0031-8183
URN:NBNurn:nbn:hr:261:981912
Publication2022
Document URLhttp://bib.irb.hr/1189912
Type of resourceText
Access conditionsInstitutional access
Terms of useLicence In copyright icon
Created on2022-10-12 04:45:16