prikaz prve stranice dokumenta Moralna relevantnost namjera
  Download
PDF 146.33 KB
Scientific paper - Original scientific paper
Moralna relevantnost namjera
Nova prisutnost : časopis za intelektualna i duhovna pitanja, 20 (2022), 1; 41-55. https://doi.org/10.31192/np.20.1.3
Sušnik, Matej

Cite this document

Sušnik, M. (2022). Moralna relevantnost namjera. Nova prisutnost : časopis za intelektualna i duhovna pitanja, 20. (1), 41-55. doi: 10.31192/np.20.1.3

Sušnik, Matej. "Moralna relevantnost namjera." Nova prisutnost : časopis za intelektualna i duhovna pitanja, vol. 20, no. 1, 2022, pp. 41-55. https://doi.org/10.31192/np.20.1.3

Sušnik, Matej. "Moralna relevantnost namjera." Nova prisutnost : časopis za intelektualna i duhovna pitanja 20, no. 1 (2022): 41-55. https://doi.org/10.31192/np.20.1.3

Sušnik, M. (2022) 'Moralna relevantnost namjera', Nova prisutnost : časopis za intelektualna i duhovna pitanja, 20(1), pp. 41-55. doi: 10.31192/np.20.1.3

Sušnik M. Moralna relevantnost namjera. Nova prisutnost : časopis za intelektualna i duhovna pitanja [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2024 April 19];20(1):41-55. doi: 10.31192/np.20.1.3

M. Sušnik, "Moralna relevantnost namjera", Nova prisutnost : časopis za intelektualna i duhovna pitanja, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 41-55, 2022. [Online]. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:261:889449. [Accessed: 19 April 2024]

Please login to the repository to save this object to your list.
Metadata
Title (croatian)Moralna relevantnost namjera
Title (english)The Moral Relevance of Intentions
AuthorMatej Sušnik
Author's institutionInstitute of Philosophy
Scientific / art field,
discipline and subdiscipline		HUMANISTIC SCIENCES
Philosophy
Abstract (croatian)
Rasprava o moralnoj relevantnosti namjera danas se značajnim dijelom svodi na pitanje o tome jesu li namjere relevantne za moralnu dopustivost. Oni koji na to pitanje odgovaraju afirmativno svoje stajalište opravdavaju povlačenjem distinkcije između namjernog činjenja štete i štete koja nastaje kao nenamjeravani, ali predvidljivi popratni učinak nekog djelovanja. Cilj ovog članka jest kritički preispitati navedeno stajalište – također poznato kao načelo dvostrukog učinka – te pružiti alternativno shvaćanje moralne relevantnosti namjera. Prema tom shvaćanju, temelj za moralnu pohvalu i osudu ne leži u izvršenoj radnji, već u namjeri s kojom je radnja izvršena.
Abstract (english)
The debate about the moral relevance of intentions today boils down to the question of whether intentions are relevant to moral permissibility. Those who answer this question affirmatively justify their position by drawing the distinction between intentional harm and harm that occurs as an unintended, but forseeable side-effect of an action. In this article, I critically examine this view—also known as the principle of double effect—and propose an alternative understanding of the moral relevance of intentions. According to this understanding, the basis of moral praise and blame does not lie in the performed act, but rather in the intention with which an action is performed.
Keywords (croatian)
Keywords (english)
Languagecroatian
Publication typeScientific paper - Original scientific paper
Publication statusPublished
Peer reviewPeer review
Publication versionPublished version
Journal titleNova prisutnost : časopis za intelektualna i duhovna pitanja
Numberingvol. 20, no. 1, pp. 41-55
p-ISSN1334-2312
e-ISSN1848-8676
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.31192/np.20.1.3
URN:NBNurn:nbn:hr:261:889449
Publication2022
Type of resourceText
Access conditionsOpen access
Terms of useLicence In copyright icon
Created on2022-01-24 13:04:47